OGIP 2011
Asia Pacific-Oil and Gas Intellectual Parade 2011 (OGIP2011)
Kamis, 10 Maret 2011
Asia Pacific Student Competition Oil and Gas Intellectual Parade 2011 Result! :D
Smart Competition
1. Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia
2. Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
3. UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Student Paper Competition
1. Alkaline Flooding Of Low Acid Number Crude Oil ( Aiman Jamaludin, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia)
2. UtiIization Of Sillica Mud Porong Sidoarjo As Strength Retrogration Control Additive To decrease Drilling Cost And Enviromental Contamination (Rudi Kurniawan, UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
3.Decrease the Dependency of Using Petroleum Sulphonat as Petroleum-based Surfactant in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Using Natural Surfactant MES From Palm Oil. (Ahmad Arif Fadhlirrahman, Albert S.P. Pakpahan, and Zayda Zahara, from Gajah Mada University, Indonesia)
Plan of Development Competition
1. Institut Teknologi Bandung
Jovie Yunara
Zilva Rifanti Latifa
Nikita Dewi Fairuz
Abdurrahman Fajar Muslim
Agung Prasetyo Nugroho
2. Trisakti University
Andrian Raharjo
Hazeon Eduward
Milky Umar
Naraswari Probowati
Savitri Mutiah
3. UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta
Molensky Julysdayani
Rizqi Silvia Dewi
Sondang Herianto Sahat M.T.S
Aldis Ramadhan
Sri Rahayu
Congratulation for all the winners, for next post, there will be the profile from each champions :D Just wait for it!!!
Sabtu, 05 Maret 2011
Announcement of Plan of Development Competition OGIP 2011
Dear Participant,
Thank you for your participation in the Plan of Development Competition (PODC) Oil and Gas Intellectual Parade (OGIP) 2011, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta. According to report of Plan of Development that submitted to the committee, we have selected 6 finalist who will present their work in Yogyakarta. The selection is based on the completeness of data which is analyzed. So, We congratulate the following finalist
STT MIGAS Team
Deddy Fernando
Zulmi Ramadhana
Octavia Adrianti P.
Randi C. Tombuku
Keiza Cindy Callista
Trisakti Team :
Andrian Raharjo
Hazeon Eduward
Milky Umar
Naraswari Probowati
Savitri Mutiah
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Team
Molensky Julysdayani
Rizqi Silvia Dewi
Sondang Herianto Sahat M.T.S
Aldis Ramadhan
Sri Rahayu
Institut Teknologi Bandung Team
Jovie Yunara
Zilva Rifanti Latifa
Nikita Dewi Fairuz
Abdurrahman Fajar Muslim
Agung Prasetyo Nugroho
Universitas Proklamasi ’45 Team
Agustinho Da Silva
Eduardo Gonzalves
Maximiano Gama Suarez
Rizka Cynthia M.
Ramdan
Universitas Gadjah Mada
M. Amin Ahlun Nazar
Irien Akinina
Erfandi Adhiansyah
Ali Akbar Velayati
Anwar Sadat
We want to give our deepest gratitude for every team who applied for this competition. We know it required a lot of hard work and we truly appreciate all the efforts. We will give the Certificates for all participants who join the selection round. For the selected teams, please prepare your presentation in final round.
Best Regards,
Uwes Qorni
Project Manager POD Competition
Asia Pacific Student Competition OGIP 2011
SMART COMPETITION-ASIA PACIFIC STUDENT COMPETITION OGIP 2011
A. Game Format
1. The games will be single elimination in which three teams compete and the winning team (team with most points at end of the round) will advance to the next round.
2. There will be a three rounds of competition that is Preliminary Round, Semi-Final, and Final round
B. Tournament Officials
1. Judges: Each Competition will have three judges, namely
Mr. Prijo Hutomo from Star Energy as Manager SHE (Savety Health Environment)
Mr. Rinaldi Imran from Samudra Energy as Manager EOR
Mr. Harry Budiharjo from UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta as Lecture of Petroleum Engineering Department
All judges' decisions concerning compliance to the rules and awarding of points will be final.
2. Moderator/ Host: Each Competition will have a moderator. There may be two moderators to share the responsibility. The moderator(s) will read the questions, consult judges as needed to determine the correctness of answers, award and deduct points, and otherwise enforce the rules of competition.
3. Scorekeeper: Each game will have at least one scorekeeper. The scorekeeper(s) will keep the official score and individual statistics. Games will not be considered final until the scorekeeper has declared the official score.
4. TImekeeper: Each game will have one timekeeper. The timekeeper will enforce time limits and supervise the game clock.
C. Equipment
1. All games will be played such that each participant in the current game has a "buzzer" – an electronic device that determines which participant buzzes in to answer a question first.
a. Each participant is responsible for monitoring whether his or her own buzzer is operating properly throughout the game.
b. If a buzzer malfunctions, only the current toss-up question or the last completed toss-up question can be replayed, subject to the moderator’s ruling that the malfunction impacted play of that question.
2. Timed games will use a clock clearly visible to both teams.
3. Participants will be provided paper and pencils.
4. Calculators will be provided by Committee. To ensure fairness, competitors will use only the provided calculators.
5. Participants may not use reference materials during the game.
D. Participants
1. A team must be a STUDENT , no student graduate.
2. A team consists of 3 players.
3. Each team shall designate a team captain.
E. Time
1. Tardiness of more than 5 minutes from the scheduled match time may result in a forfeit, unless the lateness is the fault of the tournament, or the tournament officials are satisfied with other good cause.
2. There is no time limit for each a round because every team must complete the 5 compulsary questions, 10 toss-up questions and 10 bonus questions .
3. If too long to answer the questions then the judges and a moderator may consider these questions can not answered by participants Each team
4. The team with more points at the end of the game wins.
5. Similarity of end score
Will given One Question, A player who has buzzed the first time given the opportunity to choose to answer the question or throw a question to the opponent team. if the team given opportunity to the opponent team, than the team must answer the question, and if correct answer the team that answer will be win in that round. and if the answer is incorrect , then the team that provides opportunity to opponent team will be a winner.
6. The clock used by the game officials is the official time and is not contestable.
F. Questions
1. Each game consists of 5 compulsory questions worth up to 10 points and 10 toss-up questions worth up to 10 points and bonus questions, worth up to 20 points each.
a. A team receives a bonus question for each toss-up question correctly answered by one of its players
2. Questions are intended to test the contestants’ knowledge of petroleum engineering and the petroleum industry. Questions may include history, trivia, current events, technical questions, calculations, and problem solving.
G. Compulsory Questions
1. Each participant is given 5 compulsory questions which must be answered
2. No toss-up question, so if the team can answer the compulsory question the team will get 10 points and if the team can not answer that question then will not get the points or add points. if the answer wrong then there is no reduction point.
H. Toss-Up Quetions
1. A player may “buzz in” (using his/her buzzer) to answer a toss-up question at any point after the moderator has begun reading the question. There will be no signaling between team members (or from the audience) to indicate who will buzz in on a toss-up question. Restricted signaling includes verbal signals, written signals, hand motions, head motions, eye contact, and anything else construed as signaling by the tournament officials. Violation of the signaling rules will result in forfeiture of opportunity to answer the toss-up. Repeated violations can result in ejection and/or disqualification per the “Ethics and Conduct” rules.
2. Once a player has buzzed in, a tournament official will verbally recognize the player by team name and contestant name. If a player repeatedly responds before being recognized, tournament officials reserve the right to invalidate that player’s response, turning the question over to the other team, if applicable.
3. The player who buzzed in and is recognized by the moderator may NOT confer verbally or otherwise with teammates (or spectators). Should this occur, the player will lose the chance to respond to the question, and the opposing team will be allowed to answer, if applicable. Alternately, the question may be thrown out if necessary at the discretion of tournament officials. Repeated violations can result in ejection and/or disqualification per the “Ethics and Conduct” rules.
4. If a player buzzes in before the moderator has finished reading, the moderator will stop at that point. If the answer given is incorrect, the moderator will finish the question for the other team only. The moderator will not reread the entire question but will resume at a natural point in the question.
5. An answer to a toss-up must begin within 5 seconds after the player has been recognized. An answer started after the timekeeper has said "Time" will be treated as no answer. Ties between the player and the timekeeper are decided in favor of the player.
6. Players have 5 seconds to buzz in after the moderator has finished reading the toss-up. If the player answers incorrectly, the other team will then have 5 additional seconds to buzz in. Some questions may permit more time, which will be noted specifically by the question.
7. Decisions as to whether players have exceeded the allotted time to buzz in or to answer may be rendered only by the tournament officials and are not contestable.
8. Each toss-up question is worth 10 points.
I. Bonus Questions
1. Team will get a bonus question if the answer right in toss-up questions
2. On bonus questions, the team captain will give the answer or explicitly designate another team member to give the answer. Any other player’s answer will not be accepted.
3. A team has 25 seconds to answer a bonus question. The 25 seconds starts when the moderator finishes reading the question. If the moderator is asked to repeat the question – the time will still be counting down. After 25 seconds, the moderator will prompt the team for an answer. Once prompted, the team captain (or the team member he designates) must immediately begin answering or forfeit the opportunity to answer.
4. A team may begin its answer before the moderator is finished reading all of a bonus question. In such cases, the moderator stops reading when the team begins its answer. If the bonus contains another part, and the first part was answered correctly, the moderator then reads the next part of the question.
5. Each bonus question is worth up to 20 points.
J. Analysis Question
1. This question only to participants who entered the final round.
2. This question is a question of analysis. which later will be given a problem in the petroleum industry activities and participants are required to draw the design, plan and built or to problem solving. each team will be given supplies such as paper with size 2m x 2m, pencils, and markers.
and then design and answers must be presented in front of the judges.
3. The score :
Min Score = 50 and Max Score = 100
4. Time to problem solving will given 20 minutes
K. Correct Answers
1. The moderator will accept only the first answer given by a player.
2. Common acronyms and abbreviations are often acceptable (e.g.,chemical symbols, state postal abbreviations, organizational acronyms), unless they appear in the question, in which case themoderator may prompt the player to expand the acronym or abbreviation.
L. Ethics and Conduct
1. All players, institutional representatives, and other persons associated with a team are bound by an honor code to behave responsibly and ethically. This includes, but is not limited to: treating all participants, attendees, and officials with courtesy, not receiving or giving impermissible assistance, not creating the temptation for another to cheat, abiding by all decisions of the tournament officials, not colluding with another person to "fix" a match result, not intentionally "throwing" a match, not writing down or recording questions and answers, honestly reporting details of game situations to tournament officials, and promptly reporting violations of this honor code to a tournament official.
2. Any tournament official may find that a player, coach, institutional representative, or other person associated with a team during the tournament has committed misconduct. Misconduct includes disruptive behavior, unethical behavior, any violation of the honor code, or other un-sportsman like conduct. Officials may interpret these categories at their discretion.
3. Major infractions and/or repeated infractions may result in ejection for an individual and/or disqualification for a team at the discretion of tournament officials.
M. Results
1. Results of all the competition will be announced and awards will be distributed immediately following the competition
2. For the winner will be obtain prize
N. Team Bracket
1. Subject to change based on number of team
2. Cap Team would be take 18 teams and elimination round will be conducted 3 teams to pick one winner to go into the semi-finals.
3. If the number of participants is less than 18, then the committee can change the team bracket. e.g., at elimination round would be conducted 2 teams to pick one winner to go into the semi-finals
4. Before the competition team leader took the lottery to get the position of A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2. For semi-final round, winners from each of A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2 will receive the game on semi-final round (e.g., A1 Vs A2, B1 Vs B2, C1 Vs C2). For Final round, winners from Each group A, B, C will receive the game on final round to find the team that will be get 1st, 2nd, and 3th positions.
UGM
Tri Rani Puji Astuti
Aditya Ariewijaya
Chrystian Afico Irlando Sianuri
UP45 A
Petra Steven Wattimury
Jackson Andreas Theo Pok
Nelson Dicky Sumantri
UP45 B
Rauf Wanda Adkhani Nur Rokhman
Muhammad Imam Mutaqin
Candido Gomes Cardoso
ITB A
Albaihaqi
Muhammad Fadhian Aqthori
Bobby Dillon
ITB B
Muhammad Taisar
Nur Iman Khamidy
Stefanus Kusuma Adityawan
UTP
Kang Hoi Yee
Muhammad Aiman Bin Jamaludin
Adonis Singh Bhullor
STT Migas
Theo Andy Setio
Hilda Yunda
Riswan Herdian
UI A
Nirwanto Honsono
Catur Nitya Vinaya Natawidha
Ira Trisnawati
UI B
Monica Wijaya
Nur Muchamad Arifin
Jacquin Suryadi
UNPAD
Hitler Sijabat
Jonatan Kristian
Mohamad Reza Widiatmo
Trisakti A
John Adrianus Hutapea
Vanny Santoso
William Thopyen
Trisakti B
Akhmad Dzaky
Fery Ferdiansyah
Yogi Haryo Prakoso
UPN A
Fahmi Novalasa
Febri Indah Triwinesty
Angga Agus
UPN B
Bagus Indra Ardiyanto
Muhammad Rasyid Ridlah
Eko Priyatno
UTM A
UTM B
Re-Announcement of Student Paper Competition
With this news, the committee would like to inform you that there are changes in the composition of the Student Paper Contest finalists OGIP 2011, we will describe as follows:
• 7 finalist who has spread the committee on February 11, 2011 via email / blogs:
1. Indonesia's Energy Challenge: Geothermal Energy Development and The Law Implementations. (Tulus Imaro from Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia)
2. Water Injection Success Analysis. (Yayu Anggreiny, Giovanni Primavera Sianipar, and Mario Dela Fernando Ndruru from Trisakti University, Indonesia)
3. Decrease the Dependency of Using Petroleum Sulphonat as Petroleum-based Surfactant in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Using Natural Surfactant MES From Palm Oil. (Ahmad Arif Fadhlirrahman, Albert S.P. Pakpahan, and Zayda Zahara, from Gajah Mada University, Indonesia)
4. Migration Within Coal Pores By Lowering Temperature Trough Nitro Injection in Order to Increase Rate of Recovery and Production of CBM Well. (Tyas Karismasari from Gajah Mada University, Indonesia)
5. Gas Production Generated From Crude Oil Biodegradation : Application in Microbe Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR)(Kenny Lischer from University of Indonesia, Indonesia)
6. Extremophile Microbes Type IRSM-1 Consortium as Surfactant Producer
to Enhance Oil Recovery( Aditya Rinus P Putra, Muhammad Iqbal, Faris Najmudin, and Tangguh Muhammad yunus from University of Indonesia, Indonesia)
7.Alkaline Flooding Of Low Acid Number Crude Oil ( Aiman, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia)
*February 24, 2011, finalist number 6 from UI (University of Indonesia) disqualified because they could not meet the administrative requirements of up to 1 week time limit has been determined from the beginning. Then replaced by reserves from UPN (Based on the jury's decision).
*March 4, 2011, finalist number 4 from UGM (University Of Gadjah Mada) Finalists officially resigned because they felt inadequate and unable to present their paper for some reason. Based on the above reasons, committee officially announce the Student Paper Contest Finalists OGIP 2011, as follows:
1. Indonesia's Energy Challenge: Geothermal Energy Development and The Law Implementations. (Tulus Imaro from Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia)
2. Water Injection Success Analysis. (Yayu Anggreiny, Giovanni Primavera Sianipar, and Mario Dela Fernando Ndruru from Trisakti University, Indonesia)
3. Decrease the Dependency of Using Petroleum Sulphonat as Petroleum-based Surfactant in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Using Natural Surfactant MES From Palm Oil. (Ahmad Arif Fadhlirrahman, Albert S.P. Pakpahan, and Zayda Zahara, from Gajah Mada University, Indonesia)
4. Gas Production Generated From Crude Oil Biodegradation : Application in Microbe Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR)(Kenny Lischer from University of Indonesia, Indonesia)
5.Alkaline Flooding Of Low Acid Number Crude Oil ( Aiman, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia)
6.UtiIization Of Sillica Mud Porong Sidoarjo As Strength Retrogration Control Additive To decrease Drilling Cost And Enviromental Contamination (Rudi Kurniawan, UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
We hope that all decisions be well received without compromising the spirit of competition. Note: All decisions of the jury can’t be contested. The committee is only informing.
Best Regards
Alvianty Dwi Prasetya
Project Manager of Student Paper Competition OGIP 2011
• 7 finalist who has spread the committee on February 11, 2011 via email / blogs:
1. Indonesia's Energy Challenge: Geothermal Energy Development and The Law Implementations. (Tulus Imaro from Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia)
2. Water Injection Success Analysis. (Yayu Anggreiny, Giovanni Primavera Sianipar, and Mario Dela Fernando Ndruru from Trisakti University, Indonesia)
3. Decrease the Dependency of Using Petroleum Sulphonat as Petroleum-based Surfactant in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Using Natural Surfactant MES From Palm Oil. (Ahmad Arif Fadhlirrahman, Albert S.P. Pakpahan, and Zayda Zahara, from Gajah Mada University, Indonesia)
4. Migration Within Coal Pores By Lowering Temperature Trough Nitro Injection in Order to Increase Rate of Recovery and Production of CBM Well. (Tyas Karismasari from Gajah Mada University, Indonesia)
5. Gas Production Generated From Crude Oil Biodegradation : Application in Microbe Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR)(Kenny Lischer from University of Indonesia, Indonesia)
6. Extremophile Microbes Type IRSM-1 Consortium as Surfactant Producer
to Enhance Oil Recovery( Aditya Rinus P Putra, Muhammad Iqbal, Faris Najmudin, and Tangguh Muhammad yunus from University of Indonesia, Indonesia)
7.Alkaline Flooding Of Low Acid Number Crude Oil ( Aiman, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia)
*February 24, 2011, finalist number 6 from UI (University of Indonesia) disqualified because they could not meet the administrative requirements of up to 1 week time limit has been determined from the beginning. Then replaced by reserves from UPN (Based on the jury's decision).
*March 4, 2011, finalist number 4 from UGM (University Of Gadjah Mada) Finalists officially resigned because they felt inadequate and unable to present their paper for some reason. Based on the above reasons, committee officially announce the Student Paper Contest Finalists OGIP 2011, as follows:
1. Indonesia's Energy Challenge: Geothermal Energy Development and The Law Implementations. (Tulus Imaro from Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia)
2. Water Injection Success Analysis. (Yayu Anggreiny, Giovanni Primavera Sianipar, and Mario Dela Fernando Ndruru from Trisakti University, Indonesia)
3. Decrease the Dependency of Using Petroleum Sulphonat as Petroleum-based Surfactant in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Using Natural Surfactant MES From Palm Oil. (Ahmad Arif Fadhlirrahman, Albert S.P. Pakpahan, and Zayda Zahara, from Gajah Mada University, Indonesia)
4. Gas Production Generated From Crude Oil Biodegradation : Application in Microbe Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR)(Kenny Lischer from University of Indonesia, Indonesia)
5.Alkaline Flooding Of Low Acid Number Crude Oil ( Aiman, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia)
6.UtiIization Of Sillica Mud Porong Sidoarjo As Strength Retrogration Control Additive To decrease Drilling Cost And Enviromental Contamination (Rudi Kurniawan, UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
We hope that all decisions be well received without compromising the spirit of competition. Note: All decisions of the jury can’t be contested. The committee is only informing.
Best Regards
Alvianty Dwi Prasetya
Project Manager of Student Paper Competition OGIP 2011
Rabu, 02 Maret 2011
Golf, Share, Meeting, and Panel Discussion Invitation
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)